Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained

Emily Dickinson's "Utterance" explores the complexities of language, thought, and the limitations inherent in the act of expression. The poem delves into the difficulties of capturing the intricacies of human experience in language, painting a picture of an almost-but-not-quite successful endeavor to articulate one's inner world. In characteristic Dickinson fashion, the poem is concise, but it offers a rich tapestry of images and questions that provoke the reader to ponder the ineffable qualities of life and thought.

The opening lines, "I found the phrase to every thought / I ever had, but one," present the speaker's confidence in her mastery over language. There is an implied sense of triumph in finding the "phrase to every thought," suggesting that language usually serves her well in expressing her mental landscapes. However, the addition of "but one" immediately introduces tension, offering a counterpoint to the initial sense of accomplishment. This sole thought "defies" her, hinting at the limitations of language.

The image of a "hand / Did try to chalk the sun" serves as a metaphor for the struggle to articulate this elusive thought. Chalking the sun is an impossible feat; the sun is too grand, too ephemeral, too full of energy to be contained within something as limited and temporal as chalk. Here, Dickinson is suggesting that some thoughts or experiences are so vast or intense that they defy expression, as a hand trying to capture the sun would fail miserably.

This failure to express is further extended through the line, "To races nurtured in the dark." This adds a new layer of complexity to the poem, hinting at the inadequacies not just in individual expression but perhaps in collective human understanding. Those "nurtured in the dark" could be interpreted as people who have not yet been enlightened by a certain knowledge or experience, raising the question of how they would even begin to understand or express something as majestic as the sun.

The concluding lines, "Can blaze be done in cochineal, / Or noon in mazarin?" close the poem with questions rather than answers. Cochineal and mazarin are both pigments, used for creating color, but they are insufficient for capturing the essence of something as vibrant as a blaze or as radiant as noon. The rhetorical questions assert the poem's main theme: that some aspects of human experience are too grand, too complex, or too ineffable to be captured in language or any other medium.

From a historical perspective, Emily Dickinson wrote during a time of great intellectual and philosophical upheaval. The 19th century saw the questioning of religious, philosophical, and social certainties. The limitations of language to capture the complexities of human experience were a recurring theme in the literature and philosophy of the era. Dickinson's poem taps into this zeitgeist, probing the boundaries of what can and cannot be articulated.

In summary, "Utterance" by Emily Dickinson serves as a nuanced reflection on the limitations of language and the complexities of human thought and experience. While language can often serve us well, the poem acknowledges that there are frontiers of human experience that remain ineffable. Through evocative metaphors and rhetorical questions, Dickinson encapsulates the struggle and the humility that come with trying to express the inexpressible, rendering the poem a poignant meditation on the act of utterance itself.

Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!

Other Poems of Interest...