Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained

"Sonnet: To Eva" by Sylvia Plath poses a striking interrogation of the complex interplay between the internal and external elements that constitute identity. The poem employs the metaphor of a broken skull to examine the loss of a woman's essence, reflecting on the impermeability of internal experiences and the futility of recreating an identity that has been shattered.

In the opening quatrain, Plath establishes a hypothetical situation, suggesting that breaking a skull is analogous to cracking a clock. She draws a clear parallel between human anatomy and mechanical objects, "steel palms of inclination" crushing "metal and rare stone," dehumanizing the individual. This mechanistic view devalues the complexity of human experience, reducing the intricate webs of love, desire, and thought to mere "cogs and disks."

What Plath describes as a "woman" and her "loves and stratagems" are subsequently dismissed as "inane mechanic whims," as if her existence can be easily decoded and discarded. The notion that one's intricate, internal workings are merely "idle coils of jargon yet unspoken" challenges conventional wisdom, highlighting how identity can neither be fully articulated nor understood.

However, the following lines convey a kind of poetic justice. The imagery shifts from metal and stone to "scraps of rusted reverie," suggesting that the remnants of this shattered identity defy reconstruction. No "man nor demigod" could reconstruct the lost individual from "wheels of notched tin platitudes," signifying that the woman's internal world-her dreams, ideals, and beliefs-are not easily commodified or replicated.

The poem closes with a hauntingly absurd image: "The idiot bird leaps up and drunken leans / To chirp the hour in lunatic thirteens." The bird, like the destroyed skull, serves as a corrupted reflection of the woman's internal world, a chaotic ruin of what once was. The "lunatic thirteens" serve as a grotesque marker of time, challenging the rigid structure of the sonnet form itself. In doing so, Plath questions the limitations of language and form to capture the chaos of individual experience.

In this poem the sonnet form itself becomes a part of the poem's thematic irony. The sonnet, often seen as an encapsulation of idealized love and beauty, is instead used to dissect and examine something broken and mechanical-a skull that symbolizes a woman reduced to mere parts. The poem seems to indicate that even in using a beautiful, classical form like the sonnet, one cannot make sense of a world-or a woman-reduced to shattered pieces.

"Sonnet: To Eva" is a poignant exploration of the fragility of identity and the impermanence of internal experiences. Through its visceral imagery and potent metaphors, the poem serves as a grim reminder that the unique intricacies that make up a human life are both precious and perilously delicate. Thus, Plath delivers a compelling critique of reductive perspectives that attempt to encapsulate the complexity of individual existence through external means, leaving us to grapple with the irrevocable loss that occurs when such a life is shattered.

Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!

Other Poems of Interest...