Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained

In Robert Pinsky's "Essay on Psychiatrists: 16. Generalizing, Just And Unjust," the poet tackles the notion of generalization as it applies to psychiatrists, probing the limitations and pitfalls of such broad strokes. The poem, through its contemplative tone, brings into question the ethics, stereotypes, and complexities surrounding the field of psychiatry.

Pinsky starts off with a caveat: "As far as one can generalize," thereby admitting the insufficiency of the exercise at hand. He mentions the stereotypes often associated with psychiatrists-being Jewish, being an only child, possessing a "hard, venal quality"-with a skeptical tone. The poem seems to caution against viewing psychiatrists-or any professional group, for that matter-through the lens of sweeping generalizations.

At the center of the poem is the subject of 'venality,' or the association of the profession with money and privilege. Pinsky discusses the "tax-deductible status" of psychiatric services and its potential to foster resentment or envy. In doing so, he opens up a larger ethical question about the value of different forms of labor and service. Why shouldn't the "lute-player, waitress, and actor" also offer tax-deductible services? This part of the poem argues that such financial considerations can distort our perspectives, prompting us to commodify even sacred or deeply personal experiences, like "Seder Services at hotels" or "the winning side in a war."

The poem culminates in likening psychiatrists to cowboys, describing both as "stock characters." Just as cowboys roam "the lonely ranges and secret mesas" of their genre, psychiatrists navigate the complicated terrains of the human mind. By making this comparison, Pinsky touches on the concept of archetypes and their role in shaping public perception. He argues that psychiatrists, like cowboys, have been both limited and ennobled by the stories told about them. The naming of specific movies featuring psychiatrist characters like in "Now, Voyager (1942)" and "The Third Secret (1964)" further emphasizes this notion of cultural imprinting, demonstrating how such roles in popular culture have influenced the public's understanding of the profession.

In summary, "Generalizing, Just And Unjust" offers a nuanced, critical exploration of the pitfalls of generalization while pondering ethical concerns associated with psychiatry. Through its structure and thematic substance, the poem demonstrates the complexities of human professions and calls for a more nuanced understanding. In comparing psychiatrists to cowboys, Pinsky crafts a compelling metaphor for how roles get mythologized, for better or worse, while also highlighting the human propensity for stereotyping. This poem serves as an eloquent reminder of the complexities inherent in any attempt to summarize or categorize human endeavors and professions.

Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!

Other Poems of Interest...