Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained

"Homage to Sextus Propertius: 5" by Ezra Pound confronts the paradoxes of creative endeavor, wavering between the personal and the monumental, love and war, smallness and grandiosity. It raises compelling questions: What is a worthy subject for art? Can love poetry attain the gravity of epic war stories?

Pound begins by invoking Helicon, the mountain home of the Muses, suggesting an intention to cleanse or renew poetic tradition. His Muse urges him to move to weightier matters, reflecting the zeitgeist that associates worth with vastness and historical grandeur. The poetic voice is torn between embracing grand themes, such as the conquests of Augustus, and a realization that his "genius is no more than a girl."

This tension illuminates the crux of the poem: What does it mean to write "many love-lyrics" in a world that measures worth by triumphs and conquests? In the second section, the poem acknowledges that neither Calliope nor Apollo guided him but rather a muse of more personal dimensions. The love he writes about is not grand in a historical or mythological sense; it's made of simple, tangible things like mussed hair, sleeping eyelids, and intimate play.

However, Pound doesn't dismiss these small moments as trivial. On the contrary, he suggests that "whatever she does or says, We shall spin long yarns out of nothing." He affirms the power of ordinary life to inspire, contesting the dominant idea that true greatness only lies in the grand narratives of history, war, or myth. In this perspective, love becomes as vital a topic for poetry as Augustus' triumphs or the sagas of ancient heroes.

The poem shifts again in the third section, emphasizing that it's "noble to die of love," juxtaposing this personal loss with the notion of being "uncuckolded for a season." The poetic voice rejects the grandiose judgments passed upon love and its worthiness as a subject of art, arguing that the universal human experience of love, in all its nuances, is an epic in its own right.

Though Pound positions himself within a historical context that idolizes the great and the monumental, he challenges this preference. He does this subtly, by having his speaker torn between the 'great' subjects of historical conquest and the 'small' matters of personal love, showing that even within a single individual, these conflicting perspectives can coexist.

Pound's poem confronts the reader with a profound paradox: the tension between the public and the private, the monumental and the trivial. The poet both succumbs to and resists the societal norms that dictate what subjects are considered worthy of poetic exploration. In doing so, he presents a nuanced critique of how value is ascribed in both art and life, ultimately leaving the reader with more questions than answers - a fitting outcome for a work that grapples with such complexities.

Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!

Other Poems of Interest...