|
Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained | |||
Adrienne Rich's poem "At Hertford House" reflects on the theme of disconnection between beauty and utility, exploring how objects once created for use and enjoyment have become mere artifacts for observation. Through evocative imagery and a contemplative tone, Rich delves into the tension between past and present, art and life, and the loss of ease and intimacy with beauty. The poem opens with a statement about the current state of perfection: "Perfection now is tended and observed, / Not used; we hire the spawn of Caliban / For daily service." This line suggests that the beautiful objects in Hertford House are no longer part of everyday life but are instead maintained and admired from a distance. The reference to "Caliban," a character from Shakespeare's *The Tempest*, implies that those who serve and maintain these objects are perceived as lower-class, contrasting with the refined perfection of the artifacts. Rich describes the exquisite craftsmanship of these objects: "In our careful world / Inlay of purple-wood and tulip, curved / To mime the sheen of plumes and peacocks' eyes, / Exists for inspection only." The detailed imagery of inlaid wood and peacock feathers emphasizes the beauty and artistry of the objects, yet they are "for inspection only," highlighting the separation between their aesthetic value and practical use. The poet continues to illustrate the untouchable nature of these items: "And the jars / Of apple-green and white, where wooing's done / In panels after Boucher—such we prize / Too well to fill with roses." The jars, decorated with romantic scenes reminiscent of Boucher's paintings, are too precious to serve their original purpose of holding flowers. This underscores the transformation of functional items into untouchable treasures. Rich reflects on the awkwardness of navigating this world of preserved perfection: "Chocolate, too, / Will not again be frothed in cups like these; / We move meticulously, ill at ease / Amid perfections." The reference to chocolate not being frothed in these cups further emphasizes the loss of their original use. The inhabitants of this world are described as moving "meticulously" and "ill at ease," suggesting discomfort and a lack of natural interaction with these objects. The poet questions why these objects should remain untouched: "Why should a porcelain plaque / Where Venus pulls her pouting Adon on / Through beds of blushing flowers, seem unfit / For casual thumbprint?" The rhetorical question challenges the notion that these beautiful artifacts are too sacred for everyday interaction, suggesting a longing for a time when beauty was integrated into daily life. Rich highlights the division between practical use and aesthetic appreciation: "There's a division nothing can make sweet / Between the clods of usage and the toys / We strum our senses with." This division creates a dissonance, where practical items are separated from those meant for mere sensory pleasure. The "clods of usage" represent everyday functional items, while the "toys" are the beautiful artifacts that no longer serve their intended purpose. The poem concludes with a reflection on historical use and appreciation of beauty: "But Antoinette / Ran her long tortoise-shell and silver comb / Through powdered yellow hair, and would have laughed / To think that use too mean for art or craft." Rich evokes the image of Marie Antoinette, who integrated beauty and luxury into her daily life without the separation between utility and art. This contrast highlights how modern attitudes have changed, creating a sense of loss and disconnection from the intimate, practical engagement with beautiful objects. "At Hertford House" by Adrienne Rich captures the dissonance between the preservation of beauty and its practical use, reflecting on how historical artifacts have become untouchable treasures rather than integrated parts of life. Through rich imagery and contemplative language, Rich invites readers to consider the impact of this separation on our relationship with beauty and the potential loss of ease and intimacy in our interactions with the past. The poem serves as a meditation on the transformation of art from living, usable objects to mere subjects of observation, and the resulting loss of natural engagement with beauty.
| Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!Other Poems of Interest...THE SEA AND THE SKYLARK by GERARD MANLEY HOPKINS LAYS OF FRANCE: SONG (2) by MARIE DE FRANCE A DIALOGUE (FOR A BASE AND TWO TREBLES) by JOSEPH BEAUMONT ASPIRATIONS: 3 by MATHILDE BLIND ELEGY: A WHITE NYMPH by ANDRE MARIE CHENIER PLAINS BORN by CHARLES BADGER CLARK JR. |
|