Poetry Explorer

Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained

NEGATIVES, by             Poet Analysis     Poet's Biography

Derek Walcott’s "Negatives" is a powerful and poignant reflection on the brutal realities of war, the dehumanizing effects of colonialism, and the complexities of historical memory. Centered around the Nigerian Civil War (1967-1970) and the tragic impact of the Biafra conflict, the poem grapples with the imagery of death, media representation, and the difficulty of truly understanding or engaging with the suffering of others. Through vivid, often unsettling imagery, and an exploration of the ways in which war is framed and consumed by distant audiences, Walcott raises important questions about empathy, historical trauma, and the role of the poet in witnessing violence.

The poem begins with a stark "news clip" of "the invasion of Biafra," situating the reader immediately within the context of the Nigerian Civil War. Biafra, a region in southeastern Nigeria, declared its independence in 1967, leading to a devastating civil war marked by mass starvation and atrocities. The opening image of "black corpses wrapped in sunlight / sprawled on the white glare" is jarring and deeply unsettling, highlighting the juxtaposition between life and death, light and darkness. The "white glare" evokes both the harshness of the sun and the blinding exposure of war as seen through the lens of the media. The corpses, "wrapped in sunlight," are stripped of individuality and dignity, reduced to objects in a larger, almost surreal landscape of violence.

Walcott’s use of color—black and white—throughout the poem speaks to the stark contrasts of life and death, race, and the ways in which war is consumed by external viewers. The "white glare" entering the "central city" blurs the boundaries between the specific and the general, as the speaker struggles to recall the name of the city. This inability to name the place where such suffering occurs underscores the disconnect between those who experience violence firsthand and those who witness it from afar, through mediated images or fragmented news reports.

The poem shifts to the perspective of an outsider—a "white" figure—who "illuminates the news behind the news." This individual, perhaps a journalist or commentator, offers an analytical perspective on the conflict, comparing the plight of the Ibos (Igbos) to that of the Jews during the Holocaust. The speaker quotes this figure: "The Ibos, you see, are like the Jews, / very much the situation in Hitler's Germany, / I mean the Hausas' resentment." This comparison, while intended to explain the ethnic tensions driving the conflict, feels reductive and detached, as if the enormity of the violence can be neatly categorized and understood through historical analogy. The speaker's discomfort with this explanation is evident in the line "I try to see," suggesting that while the comparison may offer a framework for understanding, it falls short of capturing the full complexity and horror of the situation.

The speaker then turns inward, reflecting on the Nigerian poet Christopher Okigbo, who died fighting for Biafra during the war. Okigbo’s death serves as a personal touchstone for the speaker, who admits, "I never knew you, Christopher Okigbo," but nonetheless feels a connection to the poet's legacy. Okigbo's tragic fate becomes symbolic of the loss of intellectual and artistic voices in the face of violent conflict. The speaker recalls seeing Okigbo in a theatrical context, when "an actor screamed 'The tribes! / The tribes!'" This dramatic reenactment of tribal conflict underscores the historical and ongoing tensions between ethnic groups, but it also raises questions about the role of art in representing such violence. The exclamation, "The tribes! The tribes!" captures the speaker’s sense of helplessness and frustration in the face of complex, seemingly insurmountable divisions.

Walcott’s depiction of the Igbos as "stuttering, bug-eyed / prisoners of some drumhead tribunal" conveys the terror and dehumanization experienced by those caught in the conflict. The "drumhead tribunal" suggests a hastily assembled, arbitrary court of justice, where the outcome is predetermined, and the accused are powerless. The "helmeted shadows" of the soldiers could have "been white," further complicating the racial dynamics of the poem. This ambiguity suggests that the mechanisms of oppression and violence transcend specific ethnic or racial boundaries, echoing colonial histories where authority figures, regardless of race, enact violence against the oppressed.

The poem returns to the haunting image of the "sun-wrapped bodies" on the "white road," reinforcing the theme of namelessness and the erasure of individual identity in the face of mass violence. The speaker’s repeated attempt to recall "that central city" ends in frustration, with the exclamation "Christ, what is its name?" This inability to remember the name of the city reflects the speaker’s struggle to comprehend the scale of the tragedy, as well as the broader challenge of remembering and bearing witness to historical atrocities. The erasure of the city’s name symbolizes the erasure of its people, their suffering rendered abstract and distant in the minds of those who consume the news from afar.

In "Negatives," Derek Walcott grapples with the difficulty of representing violence, particularly when it is mediated through the lens of journalism and consumed by distant audiences. The poem explores the tension between the personal and the political, between the specific and the general, as the speaker reflects on the complexities of empathy and historical memory. Through its powerful imagery and meditation on the role of the poet as witness, the poem raises important questions about how we engage with suffering, both individually and collectively, and the limitations of language and representation in the face of overwhelming violence.


Copyright (c) 2024 PoetryExplorer





Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!


Other Poems of Interest...



Home: PoetryExplorer.net